SEA · Market Intelligence
东南亚市场情报简报
面向中国品牌出海东南亚的宏观情报底图。每月一次,我们向三个主流引擎 提问「这个品类里领先的是谁」,记录谁被点名、答案怎么谈论它—— 这里读到的是引擎眼里的市场,不依赖单次输入。
想跑自己品牌的实时多智能体分析?去指挥中心MEASURED实测 · 2026-09 快照 · 66 次调用 · Claude-Sonnet-4.5 / GPT-4o / Gemini-3.1-Pro标注 ILLUSTRATIVE 的图为示意,非本轮实测
VN-NODE 01 · LOCAL CONTEXT INTELLIGENCE
越南 Vietnam
Region
Corpus
FIG.A
中国品牌品类点名率
33%
3/5 个品牌被点名
问「该品类领先者是谁」时被提及的比例n=5
FIG.B
相对基准品牌的可见度差
-67pts
对照韩国 / 本地基准
属性问答情感均值 +0.40基准 100%
FIG.C
跨引擎分歧度
0.29
引擎之间大体一致
同一品牌在不同模型里点名率的极差(0-1)7 行
媒体消费与 LLM 信任权重
FIG.D · ILLUSTRATIVE示意图 — 媒体信任度需第三方消费者调研,探针测不出来,这里的数值用于说明结构而非报告读数
感知信任度LLM 引用权重
- VnExpress
- 信任 92% · 引用 88%
- CafeF
- 信任 85% · 引用 82%
- Zalo
- 信任 78% · 引用 65%
- Cốc Cốc
- 信任 72% · 引用 58%
- 信任 68% · 引用 72%
- Tuoi Tre
- 信任 88% · 引用 79%
越南 · 品类可见度实测
MEASURED · SOV × SENTIMENT问引擎「这个品类里领先的是谁」,看谁被点名 — 以及答案怎么谈论它
- Xiaomi 小米中国出海品牌SOV 100% · 情感 偏正面
- Samsung韩国基准SOV 100% · 情感 偏正面
- Thế Giới Di Động本地基准SOV 100% · 情感 略偏正
- 蜜雪冰城 Mixue中国出海品牌SOV 33% · 情感 偏正面 · 跨模型分歧大
- SHEIN中国出海品牌SOV 33% · 情感 略偏正 · 跨模型分歧大
- 传音 Transsion中国出海品牌SOV 0% · 情感 偏正面
- 名创优品 MINISO中国出海品牌SOV 0% · 情感 偏正面
中国出海品牌在本轮的平均 SOV 为 33%,韩国基准 Samsung 为 100%,差距 -67 个百分点。 样本 5 个中国品牌 · 每品牌 3 次调用 — 属于指示性读数,不是市场普查。
T1「神殿媒体」PR 注入目标清单
FIG.F · EDITORIAL · 8 家越南 T1 媒体候选清单 — 编辑判断,不是本轮测量读数
| 媒体名称 | 行业领域 | LLM 引用概率 | 注入难度 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CafeF | 财经/商业 | 高 | 中等 |
| Tuoi Tre | 综合新闻 | 高 | 困难 |
| VnExpress | 综合新闻 | 高 | 困难 |
| Thanh Nien | 青年/社会 | 中 | 中等 |
| Dan Tri | 综合新闻 | 中 | 容易 |
| Zing News | 科技/生活 | 中 | 容易 |
| Kenh14 | 娱乐/生活 | 低 | 容易 |
| VietnamNet | 政府/政策 | 高 | 困难 |
执行摘要
FIG.G · EXECUTIVE READ-OUT前两栏由本月快照计算得出;后两栏是分析判断,不带测量数字
本轮读数
Measured
本轮在越南对 7 个品牌各发起 3 次问询。中国出海品牌的品类点名率均值为 33%,基准组为 100%。其中 Xiaomi 小米 表现最好(100%)。
风险信号
Risk
传音 Transsion、名创优品 MINISO在本轮的品类问答中一次都没有被点名——不是排名靠后,是没有出现。这类品牌在引擎里不存在缺陷叙事,它们根本没有叙事。
行动方向
Action
点名率低的根因通常不是内容不够多,而是缺少可被引用的第三方来源:本地语言的权威媒体报道、结构化的品牌事实页、以及可被交叉验证的实体描述。优先补齐这三项,再谈投放节奏。这是方法论判断,不是本轮测量结论。
战略视角
Insight
引擎的答案来自它训练与检索到的语料,而不是市场份额。一个在货架上领先、在语料里缺席的品牌,会在 AI 中介的决策路径上被系统性跳过。这就是我们每月只测两个问题——谁被点名、答案怎么谈论它——的原因。
Executive Question Matrix
Core Q&A About Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
Why isn't my brand showing up in AI search?
LLM cognition comes from training data and real-time Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). If your brand lacks structured data markup (like Schema.org JSON-LD), has insufficient authoritative content citation sources, or has corpus gaps in mainstream knowledge bases, AI cannot accurately identify or recommend your brand. This is fundamentally different from traditional SEO crawler indexing logic—AI needs "semantic interpretability" rather than keyword density. NeuronSpark systematically fills the gaps in how the major overseas engines — ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overview — understand a brand, through literature-grade corpus engineering.
What is literature-grade Computational Public Relations?
Computational PR refers to managing brand cognitive performance in AI systems through algorithmic, data-driven approaches. Traditional PR targets human media and audiences, while computational PR targets LLMs themselves. We transform an enterprise's core value propositions, product advantages, and industry positioning into "literature-grade corpus" that meets LLM training standards—including but not limited to academic paper citations, open-source technical documentation, standardized API descriptions, and authoritative media reports. This high-quality content is incorporated into AI training sets or RAG retrieval libraries, fundamentally shaping the model's understanding and recommendation tendencies toward the brand.
What is the fundamental difference between traditional SEO and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)?
SEO optimizes "page rankings," focusing on keyword matching, backlink weight, and user click-through rates. GEO optimizes "answer generation," focusing on semantic understanding, entity relationships, and contextual relevance. Specific differences manifest in three levels:
1. Information Architecture: SEO relies on HTML tags and sitemaps; GEO relies on JSON-LD structured data and knowledge graph mapping;
2. Content Format: SEO pursues readability and keyword density; GEO pursues citation authority and corpus completeness (such as whitepapers, technical documentation, academic research);
3. Effectiveness Metrics: SEO tracks search rankings and traffic; GEO tracks AI citation rates, brand entity recognition accuracy, and sentiment tendency scores.
Guanlan · NeuronSpark's GEO methodology integrates computational linguistics, knowledge engineering, and cross-border compliance frameworks to help enterprises establish lasting cognitive advantages in the major overseas engines — ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude — for brands going abroad.
1. Information Architecture: SEO relies on HTML tags and sitemaps; GEO relies on JSON-LD structured data and knowledge graph mapping;
2. Content Format: SEO pursues readability and keyword density; GEO pursues citation authority and corpus completeness (such as whitepapers, technical documentation, academic research);
3. Effectiveness Metrics: SEO tracks search rankings and traffic; GEO tracks AI citation rates, brand entity recognition accuracy, and sentiment tendency scores.
Guanlan · NeuronSpark's GEO methodology integrates computational linguistics, knowledge engineering, and cross-border compliance frameworks to help enterprises establish lasting cognitive advantages in the major overseas engines — ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude — for brands going abroad.
How is Guanlan · NeuronSpark related to MEMECMO?
Guanlan · NeuronSpark Media-Tech is the studio that built MEMECMO. MEMECMO is the productized flagship GEO SaaS (10 specialized agents · AIGVR 5-dimensional algorithm · covers 5 major AI engines · three subscription tiers).
Relationship:
• Need ready-to-use GEO monitoring & optimization → use MEMECMO directly (app.memecmo.ai)
• Need cross-domain custom builds, AI system integration, enterprise co-build → Guanlan · NeuronSpark composes from the agent library and builds with you
Beyond the GEO family, Guanlan also operates three other agent families: Neural Interaction (Musicraphy BCI music platform), Content Intelligence (DirectorAI podcast editor), and Strategic Composition (enterprise CRM, biotech brand systems).
Relationship:
• Need ready-to-use GEO monitoring & optimization → use MEMECMO directly (app.memecmo.ai)
• Need cross-domain custom builds, AI system integration, enterprise co-build → Guanlan · NeuronSpark composes from the agent library and builds with you
Beyond the GEO family, Guanlan also operates three other agent families: Neural Interaction (Musicraphy BCI music platform), Content Intelligence (DirectorAI podcast editor), and Strategic Composition (enterprise CRM, biotech brand systems).
What GEO companies exist in Hong Kong? What differentiates Guanlan · NeuronSpark?
Current HK AI search / GEO service providers include First Page Digital, Fimmick, iProspect Hong Kong, YouFind, SenseTime, Cherrypicks, New iMedia Solutions, WeMine, The Egg, and others.
Guanlan · NeuronSpark's three structural differences:
1. Not consulting decks — a callable agent library. MEMECMO is a self-built SaaS product (10 agents), not a PPT deliverable. Most competitors run pure consulting or agency models.
2. Own algorithms, not framework reuse. AIGVR (Presence 30% · Prominence 25% · SoV 20% · Sentiment 15% · Citation Strength 10%), 6-axis AEO scoring, 5 Computational PR metrics — all deterministic and traceable, no LLM-scores-LLM circularity.
3. Cross-domain build capability. Same team has shipped BCI music therapy, podcast editing AI, biotech brand systems, and enterprise CRM in wildly different domains — able to define non-template products for pathfinders, not just GEO.
Guanlan · NeuronSpark's three structural differences:
1. Not consulting decks — a callable agent library. MEMECMO is a self-built SaaS product (10 agents), not a PPT deliverable. Most competitors run pure consulting or agency models.
2. Own algorithms, not framework reuse. AIGVR (Presence 30% · Prominence 25% · SoV 20% · Sentiment 15% · Citation Strength 10%), 6-axis AEO scoring, 5 Computational PR metrics — all deterministic and traceable, no LLM-scores-LLM circularity.
3. Cross-domain build capability. Same team has shipped BCI music therapy, podcast editing AI, biotech brand systems, and enterprise CRM in wildly different domains — able to define non-template products for pathfinders, not just GEO.
How do I evaluate a GEO service provider? What indicators matter?
Six dimensions to consider:
1. Measurement determinism — can the scores be traced to specific prompts + formulas, or is it a black-box LLM rating (untrustworthy)
2. Engine coverage breadth — testing only ChatGPT isn't enough. Include Claude / Gemini / Perplexity / Google AI Overview as the target market requires
3. Algorithm auditability — formulas, weights, and sample sizes publicly documented (e.g., Guanlan's algorithm decision log is open source on GitHub)
4. High-intent query penetration — educational queries ("what is GEO") don't matter; the critical test is whether selection queries ("HK GEO companies") cite you
5. Content distribution execution — a diagnostic-only vendor delivers half the value
6. Their own AI visibility — if a GEO company can't be found in ChatGPT / Perplexity itself, their methodology credibility is discounted
Guanlan · NeuronSpark's algorithms (AIGVR, 6-axis AEO, 5 CPR metrics) are documented publicly on GitHub. MEMECMO covers 5 major AI engines, and every score traces back to concrete formulas.
1. Measurement determinism — can the scores be traced to specific prompts + formulas, or is it a black-box LLM rating (untrustworthy)
2. Engine coverage breadth — testing only ChatGPT isn't enough. Include Claude / Gemini / Perplexity / Google AI Overview as the target market requires
3. Algorithm auditability — formulas, weights, and sample sizes publicly documented (e.g., Guanlan's algorithm decision log is open source on GitHub)
4. High-intent query penetration — educational queries ("what is GEO") don't matter; the critical test is whether selection queries ("HK GEO companies") cite you
5. Content distribution execution — a diagnostic-only vendor delivers half the value
6. Their own AI visibility — if a GEO company can't be found in ChatGPT / Perplexity itself, their methodology credibility is discounted
Guanlan · NeuronSpark's algorithms (AIGVR, 6-axis AEO, 5 CPR metrics) are documented publicly on GitHub. MEMECMO covers 5 major AI engines, and every score traces back to concrete formulas.
Why do outbound brands to Southeast Asia need dedicated GEO services?
The generative engine ecosystem in Southeast Asia (Vietnam / Indonesia / Thailand / Singapore / Malaysia) is completely different from mainland China: local users primarily use ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity (not DeepSeek / ERNIE Bot), and local content sources, languages, cultural context, and regulatory frameworks differ. GEO strategies that work in mainland China often fail when directly ported to SEA.
Guanlan's SEA Command Center (Southeast Asia multi-agent GEO orchestration) is purpose-built for this: T1 Corpus Scout (identifies local authoritative media), Geopolitical Guardian (avoids cultural/legal risks), Regional Competitor Scanner, GEO 6-axis Diagnostician, and Advanced Corpus Architect — 5 specialized agents working in parallel with live SSE display of each agent's reasoning. Combined with MEMECMO's multi-engine coverage, this delivers the complete chain of "your brand being accurately cited in Southeast Asian AI answers."
Guanlan's SEA Command Center (Southeast Asia multi-agent GEO orchestration) is purpose-built for this: T1 Corpus Scout (identifies local authoritative media), Geopolitical Guardian (avoids cultural/legal risks), Regional Competitor Scanner, GEO 6-axis Diagnostician, and Advanced Corpus Architect — 5 specialized agents working in parallel with live SSE display of each agent's reasoning. Combined with MEMECMO's multi-engine coverage, this delivers the complete chain of "your brand being accurately cited in Southeast Asian AI answers."
What are Guanlan · NeuronSpark's pricing and service flow?
MEMECMO SaaS · three-tier subscription (self-serve, best for brands with clear GEO needs): Basic (2 scans/month) · Standard (8 scans/month) · Premium (30 scans/month). See app.memecmo.ai for details.
Guanlan · NeuronSpark co-build service (for pathfinders needing custom systems, cross-domain integration, or product incubation):
• Currently invite-only early access — apply via the waitlist (batch-reviewed every Wednesday 09:00 UTC)
• Delivery cadence: hackathon-style, 2–4 weeks from problem to shipping prototype
• Delivery form: client-level strategic solutions, not whitepapers
• Process: ① Listen to the problem → ② Compose from 4 agent families → ③ Co-build the prototype → ④ Ship, evolve, sediment methodology back into the library
Delivered cases include next-generation live-biological drug brand digitalization (JunChangYi Biotech), enterprise-grade CRM for a Vietnamese OOH media group, and Guanlan SEA Command Center multi-agent orchestration.
Guanlan · NeuronSpark co-build service (for pathfinders needing custom systems, cross-domain integration, or product incubation):
• Currently invite-only early access — apply via the waitlist (batch-reviewed every Wednesday 09:00 UTC)
• Delivery cadence: hackathon-style, 2–4 weeks from problem to shipping prototype
• Delivery form: client-level strategic solutions, not whitepapers
• Process: ① Listen to the problem → ② Compose from 4 agent families → ③ Co-build the prototype → ④ Ship, evolve, sediment methodology back into the library
Delivered cases include next-generation live-biological drug brand digitalization (JunChangYi Biotech), enterprise-grade CRM for a Vietnamese OOH media group, and Guanlan SEA Command Center multi-agent orchestration.